<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the traditional relational database dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/</link>
	<description>Callum on life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum</title>
		<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-28315</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/#comment-28315</guid>
		<description>This is an old post, but if I remember correctly, the article was proposing that relational databases are losing favour in large scale applications. Sure, the relational databases are still popular, but they&#039;re being increasingly used in new ways (sharded data for example) and new systems are being created for specific applications. The one-size-fits all relational database is no longer the power house it once was. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an old post, but if I remember correctly, the article was proposing that relational databases are losing favour in large scale applications. Sure, the relational databases are still popular, but they&#8217;re being increasingly used in new ways (sharded data for example) and new systems are being created for specific applications. The one-size-fits all relational database is no longer the power house it once was. <img src='http://www.callum-macdonald.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-28314</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/#comment-28314</guid>
		<description>I hardly think so - look at how well the Open Source databases (mySQL, Postresql) and Closed Source databases (Oracle and Microsoft) are doing.

However - there are definitely applications where a different approach is a better fit - take a look at the data model used in Google App Engine - BigTable.

my 2c
Danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hardly think so &#8211; look at how well the Open Source databases (mySQL, Postresql) and Closed Source databases (Oracle and Microsoft) are doing.</p>
<p>However &#8211; there are definitely applications where a different approach is a better fit &#8211; take a look at the data model used in Google App Engine &#8211; BigTable.</p>
<p>my 2c<br />
Danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

