<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the traditional relational database dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/</link>
	<description>Callum's musings on the world at large...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Callum</title>
		<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/#comment-28315</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/#comment-28315</guid>
		<description>This is an old post, but if I remember correctly, the article was proposing that relational databases are losing favour in large scale applications. Sure, the relational databases are still popular, but they're being increasingly used in new ways (sharded data for example) and new systems are being created for specific applications. The one-size-fits all relational database is no longer the power house it once was. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an old post, but if I remember correctly, the article was proposing that relational databases are losing favour in large scale applications. Sure, the relational databases are still popular, but they&#8217;re being increasingly used in new ways (sharded data for example) and new systems are being created for specific applications. The one-size-fits all relational database is no longer the power house it once was. <img src='http://www.callum-macdonald.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/#comment-28314</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/21/is-the-traditional-relational-database-dead/#comment-28314</guid>
		<description>I hardly think so - look at how well the Open Source databases (mySQL, Postresql) and Closed Source databases (Oracle and Microsoft) are doing.

However - there are definitely applications where a different approach is a better fit - take a look at the data model used in Google App Engine - BigTable.

my 2c
Danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hardly think so - look at how well the Open Source databases (mySQL, Postresql) and Closed Source databases (Oracle and Microsoft) are doing.</p>
<p>However - there are definitely applications where a different approach is a better fit - take a look at the data model used in Google App Engine - BigTable.</p>
<p>my 2c<br />
Danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
