<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Callum Macdonald &#187; Amazon-S3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.callum-macdonald.com/tag/amazon-s3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com</link>
	<description>Callum on life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Incremental Backup on Amazon EC2 / S3</title>
		<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/incremental-backup-on-amazon-ec2-s3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/incremental-backup-on-amazon-ec2-s3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon ec2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon-S3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ec2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s3 backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s3 incremental backup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/incremental-backup-on-amazon-ec2-s3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somebody suggested using Amazon EC2 to provide an incremental backup interface to S3. For the likes of rsync to be truly effective, you need to have an rsync program running near the data store. It struck me, you could use &#8230; <a href="http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/incremental-backup-on-amazon-ec2-s3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody <a href="http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/007641.html" target="_blank">suggested</a> using Amazon EC2 to provide an incremental backup interface to S3. For the likes of rsync to be truly effective, you need to have an rsync program running near the data store. It struck me, you could use an EC2 instance with free, high-speed bandwidth to S3 to do exactly that.</p>
<p>Using <a href="http://dev.extensibleforge.net/wiki/s3/fuse" title="s3fuse - mount Amazon S3 as a local filesystem" target="_blank">S3fuse</a> (currently down) I&#8217;m sure you could script something so users log in to the EC2 instance and then mount their S3 bucket locally. Then rsync would work pretty effectively I reckon.</p>
<p>Could even be an interesting business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/incremental-backup-on-amazon-ec2-s3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye Rsync.net, Hello Amazon S3</title>
		<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/goodbye-rsyncnet-hello-amazon-s3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/goodbye-rsyncnet-hello-amazon-s3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon-S3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsync.net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/goodbye-rsyncnet-hello-amazon-s3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 27-Nov-2008: In the end I stayed with rsync.net. Today I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;m fed up with my current backup provider, rsync.net. The service they provide is pretty solid, I&#8217;ve been using it for a few months now. The main reason &#8230; <a href="http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/goodbye-rsyncnet-hello-amazon-s3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Update 27-Nov-2008: In the end I <a title="I ended up staying with Rsync.net" href="http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/11/27/staying-with-rsyncnet/">stayed with rsync.net</a>.</em></p>
<p>Today I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;m fed up with my current backup provider, <a title="rsync.net - Use Amazon S3 instead" href="http://www.rsync.net/" target="_blank">rsync.net</a>. The service they provide is pretty solid, I&#8217;ve been using it for a few months now. The main reason I chose them at $1.80 per Gb instead of Amazon at around $0.30 per Gb is the support. They guarantee to have a real, live, intelligent engineer answer my questions. That&#8217;s worth more than a few bucks a month.</p>
<p>However, the service of late has been abysmal. As soon as my questions got beyond &#8220;How do I plug my computer in&#8221;, it took 5 days to get a response to tell me there&#8217;s a problem with their system, it should be fixed soon. Another five days later, and still no response to my question &#8220;Will you tell me when it&#8217;s working?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Given that the support I thought I was getting is apparently a myth, time to switch I think. I also discovered that they won&#8217;t automatically expand my account. So if I need more space, I have to email them to ask for it. Bah.</p>
<p>Goodbye <a title="rsync.net - Use Amazon S3 instead" href="http://www.rsync.net/" target="_blank">rsync.net</a>, I&#8217;m afraid it&#8217;s been a little disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/10/27/goodbye-rsyncnet-hello-amazon-s3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon S3</title>
		<link>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/05/amazon-s3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/05/amazon-s3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon-S3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise-Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image-Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online-Backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsync.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static-File-Hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/05/amazon-s3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon S3 is a static file hosting service from Amazon. Storage costs $0.15 USD per Gb and data transfer (outgoing) costs $0.18 USD per GB up to 10TB. As an online backup solution, it would cost less than $20 / &#8230; <a href="http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/05/amazon-s3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://aws.amazon.com/s3" title="Amazon S3: Inexpensive static file hosting" target="_blank">Amazon S3</a> is a static file hosting service from Amazon. Storage costs $0.15 USD per Gb and data transfer (outgoing) costs $0.18 USD per GB up to 10TB. As an online backup solution, it would cost less than $20 / month to store 100Gb, assuming you&#8217;re not uploading / downloading more than 20% every month.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty cheap by backup standards. But for commercial static file hosting, it&#8217;s insanely cheap. Particularly given the fact that it will scale from a few GBs today, to several TBs tomorrow.</p>
<p>I currently spend $5.40 / month for 3Gb of online backup with <a href="http://rsync.net/" title="Rsync.net - Simply the best online backup service" target="_blank">rsync.net</a>. I might consider switching to Amazon S3, although probably not for my daily backups because I get unlimited bandwidth on rsync.net and top notch support. For image archiving on the other hand, it looks very tempting.</p>
<p>The best thing, there&#8217;s no minimum spend. You don&#8217;t have to commit to spend hundreds of dollars to benefit from enterprise class storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.callum-macdonald.com/2007/09/05/amazon-s3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
